sure... i find it just as safe as nyc, if not more so..

safe for singles and small groups

My wife and I R going in Oct. for our 7th time. While this incident is horrible it could have happened anywhere. I am very concerned about it in that justice needs to be done and I am also concerned about public reaction if a verdict is perceived as being lenient.

This wont stop us from going however. My big concern about going is health (hopefully no Delhi belly) and not getting ripped off.

Firstly, you're a tourist and won't be in intimate contact with most locals. Secondly, you won't be riding on local buses. So the difficulties encountered by local women, and men for that matter, do not apply. I've traveled alone in India on a number of occasions and the only difference now is we've heard about what Indian women have endured. But for a tourist nothing has changed and travel in India alone is safe by all standards.

As a Western woman traveling in India, I think I'm remarkably safe whether traveling alone or with a friend or partner. It is local women who have been and continue to be the object of violence.

India is no more dangerous than it has been at any other time. Riding the local buses has always been risky for Indian women, but some don't have other travel options.

There is no need to not travel to India. As always, common sense and awareness of one's surroundings is smart traveling.

I felt very safe in India as a traveler several months before this happened, especially with drivers, guides and handlers. I also felt safe taking a long (6k) walk on my own in Delhi at sunset without my husband.

But I have changed my opinion about safety in India since the incident, the horrific gang rape of a young woman by a city bus driver and others, as she returned from the movies with her boyfriend.

I am fairly certain that this sort of event (gang rape by a public servant, victim and bf left for dead, bodies ignored by onlookers) has NEVER happened in this country - certainly not in NYC. And the most disturbing part is that there has been at least one more gang rape by ANOTHER bus driver since the death of the first victim:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/01/13/india-rape-death-penalty/1829925/

If I had a daughter, I now would be concerned about her traveling to India. And, as much as I fell in love with the people and the culture (a travel highlight after visiting 60+ countries), this unconscionable level of violence and sexism has made me less anxious to return.

Sorry...I meant "victims ignored by onlookers." As long as I have your attention, Amy, we really need an edit feature!

I (female) was in India on my own for ten weeks in 2001 (right after 9-11) and for six weeks in 2010. I was aware at the time both of the misogynistic attitudes of many Indian men, and of the high level of violence against women - dowry deaths, abortion of females, mistreatment of widows - but the brutality of the Delhi rape was an unpleasant surprise. However, I would have no hesitation in revisiting India on my own. But, I am older (not that that necessarily makes a difference to rapists), I am not out late at night, and I don't use commuter transport.

BTW crosscheck, I'm afraid you're overly optimistic about the US. See, for starters:

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/LA-County-Sheriffs-Department-Culver-City-Alleged-Rape-on-Public-Bus-178042791.html

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/281118

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/09/02/Woman-shot-in-Brooklyn-as-crowd-watches/UPI-49121251908303/

http://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/18/weekinreview/june-11-17-police-response-an-issue-after-central-park-attacks.html

Crosscheck, I would guess that you have heard of the Kitty Genovese case, which did happen in NYC with plenty of witnesses. The rape was not by a public servant, but the crime in progress was ignored by onlookers and victim was left for dead.

Come on, guys. Of course I am aware that there is violence the US (and I travel often to Mexico, which has its own issues), but there is nothing here on the level of the gang rapes in India, which until recently were shockingly condoned and not always reported.

thurs, those links were all very disturbing, but nobody died. And believe me - we would know if a gang rape of Delhi caliber happened in New York. One of the incidents (the dousing of water, tearing of clothes in Central Park) is 13 years old. And the four-yr old Brooklyn event was domestic violence, with the crowd watching because the perpetrator had a gun.

I do think India is safe for tourists, but I found the promo video featuring a single woman traveler insensitive in light of the current social climate. India has a dirty little secret that's not such a secret anymore, And if my kids were young women, I would not want them alone on buses like the traveler in the video.

Kathie, I grew up in NYC so of course I know about Kitty Genevese - Happened 49 years ago in 1964, immortalized by the Phil Ochs song, "Outside of a Small Circle of Friends."

http://www.youtube.com/embed/ulTmmTIlM_o

The social conscious of the whole city changed that day, and that's partly why I said that we would know if an incident like the Delhi gang rape had happened there.

crosscheck - The US has plenty of "dirty little secrets" too. All you have to do is a 'net search on "gang rape US". And I read recently that one third of US military women have suffered some form of sexual assault.

I do agree that things are worse in India, but you said "NEVER" [your caps]. Not true.

Yes, awful secrets, but I maintain that there has not been a murder/gang rape on that level here (NYC came up because a poster saying he felt less safe in New York than Delhi). We would know about it - there would have been outrage and protests and a tipping point like in India.

I respect you and Kathie tremendously, but a comparison w/ the US is off topic. Amy's question was not about which is safer. She was asking whether we would go to India alone and happily ride buses like the woman in the promo. Many others on the web are discussing the same Q because a S. Korean woman was just raped by a hotel manager at a tiger reserve.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-02-02/bhopal/36703419_1_aurangabad-judicial-custody-identification

As I said, I felt extremely safe when I was there in September. But many of my 22-year old son's friends are now traveling to Asia, and sadly, I would now advise a woman that age against going to India alone.

Misogyny is embedded into Indian society and always has been. Women are not treated with anything approaching equality and indeed in many cases are viewed as little more than chattels. As long as these attitudes are allowed to prevail women, whether local or tourists will always be at a higher risk than most western countries. Forced marriage, the mutilation of women for reason of infidelity, perceived or actual, an the killing of female babies at birth are still widespread in the sub continent and will remain so until issues of endemic corruption in the political and judicial system are addressed. Will this happen anytime soon? I seriously doubt it?

There are risks in travel anywhere, sensible precautions can minimise but not eliminate those risks. The recent events in India have highlighted the risks to women and the world has become more aware of the issues, but this type of attack has been going on for a very long time so I doubt that the actual risk level is any higher now than it ever has been in the past. he Indian authorities will doubtless hope that it will go way and maybe the worlds media will report it less, which is a real shame. Maybe if fewer people travel to India as a result and are vocal about it, then this will " encourage " the authorities to take some real and sustained action.

crellston - I doubt a drop off in western tourism would have much effect. The one good thing to come out of this is the outrage being expressed in India, by Indians, which is much more likely to have an effect, if it is sustained.

I'm currently vacationing in India (delhi/ragasthan) with my husband. I'm 31 (but i look a bit younger though and am short and thin) and honestly, given the way men look at me here, I'm not sure I'd come alone. If I did, I would definitely adopt Indian dress. I have a lot of requests for photos by men and the stares are a bit uncomfortable. I think the men are harmless, but started wearing sunglasses because I wanted to avoid accidental eye contact. I'm not saying India is unsafe, just as a single female, you should understand you might get more attention than you are used to.

Just my two cents...

There seems to be no prohibition in India against staring so everyone that's a bit different is stared at, not just young women. I'm not young by any definition and am stared at too. After a while I got used to it and ceased to notice. It's cultural and not threatening, simple open curiosity. You, or anyone, are simply the entertainment of the moment in a possibly otherwise humdrum life.

India is safe for tourists and for women traveling alone. Just like in US or in other parts of the world, one has to be cautious at all times.
The country is going through tremendous changes.With higher education, jobs outside the home, more and more women are out and about.
The men have yet to learn how to be respectful and treat women nicely. The outrage after the recent incident shows that the Indian society at large is determined to change the present treatment of women.It will take time as any change will happen at a snail's pace!
So, travel in India with caution. It is indeed an "Incredible India" and everyone should take the opportunity to visit at least once and see the enchantment. Just be extra careful.

There is a difference between being stared at as a foreigner and leered at as a woman. I also just came back from India and agree with tansmets and crosscheck. As a 59 year old woman who looks younger, I was aware of groups of men who were staring in a way that made me feel uncomfortable, so I, too would be very circumspect about a female traveling alone. I do agree with tansmets that adopting traditional dress would make it much easier. I think it's absolutely doable to travel alone, but being aware and conscious of one's own behavior and affect is important.

>>How long before you think it can get back to that?<<

Get back to what? A person's perception of safety or the reality? I don't think there is any "going back".

Before that event in Delhi occurred visitors didn't have an understanding that something like that could occur. The danger was not perceived though in reality it did exist.

Now, after that event, you are aware of the danger and can avoid it. That awareness keeps you safer now than before.

Not sure I understand the difference between a stare and a leer but youth or looking young aside, it's normal for India, kind of a national pastime. Feel threatened if you like but it's not what's being talked about. Physical abuse and worse is the issue. Foolish behavior can get a person into trouble anywhere so, failing foolishness, we are safe visiting India. Alone or otherwise.

While my husband and I were in India last year we were comfortable walking around the streets during the days, however, we recognized the fact that after dark there was a noticeable lack of women, so much so that after dinner we rarely spent time wandering the streets alone as we were a bit uncomfortable. As a tourist I believe that one is safe, however, I would be especially careful about wandering about after dark and would avoid public transportation unless accompanied by a group of people. Quite frankly we were usually exhausted from the heat by dinner time so by nightfall we had little desire to wander about. We would not hesitate to wander about though, when there were large crowds of people, including other woman. I would be more cautious now after hearing about India's recent crimes against women, but I would not hesitate to return there.

Middle and upper class Indians don't generally walk out at night unless they're close to home. Even road travel after dark is avoided. It's been that way for a long time. It's partly due to the poor road and sidewalk conditions making it more hazardous to navigate in the dark. It's also due to fear of being robbed - women particularly for their jewelry.

<<Not sure I understand the difference between a stare and a leer>>

I would say that a stare has curiosity at the heart of it, while a leer is hostile. I can feel the difference between the two. The latter makes me immediately uncomfortable.

Thursdaysd, you are probably right that a drop off in western tourism would not have any great effect but the fear of such a drop off reinforced by more forceful Foreign Office and State Department warnings could maintain pressure on the authorities. With out such pressure , I fear that media interest will wane, as it always does, and once again, these issues will be swept under the carpet by the authorities. I dearly hope I am wrong and public opinion in India forces a radical change in attitudes