772LR to set record - what does SQ have to do with it?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
772LR to set record - what does SQ have to do with it?
biz.yahoo.com/prnews/051108/sftu169.html?.v=2
Boeing is going to fly their 777-200LR demonstrator from HKG to LHR "the long way" eastbound. 23hr, 11,000nm, blah blah blah... You can read the news release.
What caught my eye is that besides Pakistan International Airlines pilots (this specific aircraft is built for PIA), it says Singapore Airlines pilots will also be onboard. Hm, does that suggest a SQ order is forthcoming? Will Boeing have to buy out SQ's 345 to make a deal like they did with SQ's 343?
Boeing is going to fly their 777-200LR demonstrator from HKG to LHR "the long way" eastbound. 23hr, 11,000nm, blah blah blah... You can read the news release.
What caught my eye is that besides Pakistan International Airlines pilots (this specific aircraft is built for PIA), it says Singapore Airlines pilots will also be onboard. Hm, does that suggest a SQ order is forthcoming? Will Boeing have to buy out SQ's 345 to make a deal like they did with SQ's 343?
#2
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I saw that on CNN this morning. Only 35 people on board. I suppose they are not going over the North Pole because this flight is for publicity? Boeing is trying to advertise that this plane can fly to any location on the planet. 23 hours. NASA better look out or they may fly it to Mars next! Hope the passengers aren't paying $5 for each glass of wine.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This flight is for the Guiness Book of Records.
Don't know the exact path, but definitely not the shortest route between HKG-LHR.
In fact, 11,000nm (or about 20,000km) is about half the circumference of the earth.
Don't know the exact path, but definitely not the shortest route between HKG-LHR.
In fact, 11,000nm (or about 20,000km) is about half the circumference of the earth.
#4
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/busine...dflight09.html
<i>Will Boeing have to buy out SQ's 345 to make a deal like they did with SQ's 343?</i>
My guess is that SQ would happily sign them over to pretty much anyone. Maybe the Google guys need something bigger than their 762 for a corporate (lead) sled.
<i>Will Boeing have to buy out SQ's 345 to make a deal like they did with SQ's 343?</i>
My guess is that SQ would happily sign them over to pretty much anyone. Maybe the Google guys need something bigger than their 762 for a corporate (lead) sled.
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't understand wally's comment, but...
The actual fligth time was 22hr 42min. The actual flight path is close to:
HKG-Midway-SFO-LAX-JFK-LHR
Probably due to LHR traffic, it circled for over half an hour over London.
Actual flight length is 11,664nm (21,601km)
The actual fligth time was 22hr 42min. The actual flight path is close to:
HKG-Midway-SFO-LAX-JFK-LHR
Probably due to LHR traffic, it circled for over half an hour over London.
Actual flight length is 11,664nm (21,601km)
Trending Topics
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, wally... Now I see what you're talking about. Hahhaha.
Next time, I want to see something like TPA-PER over the South Pole. That will solve some problem of at least one other Fodorite.
Next time, I want to see something like TPA-PER over the South Pole. That will solve some problem of at least one other Fodorite.
#11
<i>Next time, I want to see something like TPA-PER over the South Pole. That will solve some problem of at least one other Fodorite.</i>
http://home.comcast.net/~gardyloo/QF63Antarctica1.jpg
http://home.comcast.net/~gardyloo/QF63Antarctica1.jpg
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gardyloo - Cool pic. I think QF63 is SYD-JNB.
It's funny that when I looked it up, TPA-South Pole-PER is 12,157mi, or 10,564nm. In the ballpark of the distance we're talking about here.
But of course, with limited ETOPS, a flight like this will not happen in the near future.
It's funny that when I looked it up, TPA-South Pole-PER is 12,157mi, or 10,564nm. In the ballpark of the distance we're talking about here.
But of course, with limited ETOPS, a flight like this will not happen in the near future.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oceanolympia
Air Travel
4
Jul 13th, 2004 07:27 AM