Search

Ayres Rock Entry Fees

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3rd, 2004, 03:58 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ayres Rock Entry Fees

Hi All,

For anyone going to Ayres Rock the entry fee has, as of 01-April-04, more than doubled. It will now cost $25.00 per person and no this is not an April fools joke.

Is this fee hike justified? Not in my opinion and I think a few tourist operators also believe it is an unwarranted price rise. National Parks and Wildlife say that the fee is justified because they intend to build new toilets at the base of the Rock climb and at the sunset viewing area. Well bully for them, these would need to be the Taj Mahal of toilets to justify this sort of increase.

I think the NPWS needs to be reigned in as they are simply a law unto themselves and seem hell bent in locking up and detering visitors from our National Parks.

Well that is my little rant for the day, sorry if upsets anyone but I had to say it.
Paul_S is offline  
Old Apr 3rd, 2004, 06:44 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi paul,
I agree, $25.00 ist pretty steep!
However, it hasn't doubled. In Nov. last year it was $16.25 for the 3 day pass and it had been at that for a few years now.

Cheers, Mike
OzMike is offline  
Old Apr 3rd, 2004, 03:14 PM
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Mike,

I refuse to go into the park these days, I have been to the Rock more times than I can remember but that was when it was free and in the early paying days. Now if I go I don't bother going into the park.

The Centralian Advocate reported the price rise as more than doubling so I took it for granted that it had, even so $25.00 per person is outrageous. The whole place has become way too expensive for what it is in my view.
Paul_S is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2004, 06:31 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fully agree with you, Paul_S, and even though I am dismayed at the size of the price hike, I am not really surprised, as this is typical of what's happening all over the world at every major tourist attraction. A few years ago I walked around (and among)Stonehenge for free; last year I paid a hefty admission to see it from a well-set-back path with a chain boundary along it. That's life, I guess. But the charge for Uluru offends me more, because... well, frankly, everyone, it's just a big rock! With Stonehenge, or the Pyramids, you can at least stand in awe of the civilisation that produced it, and even feel like you are transported a couple of thousand years into another time... but this is just a big red rock, and not the only one in Australia! Since, as well as the entry fee, it is also a difficult place to get to, and accommodation is pretty hefty when finally you do get there, frankly, I don't think I'd recommend it unless you had a LOT of time on your hands during an Australian visit!
Alan is offline  
Old Apr 5th, 2004, 12:23 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This increased entry fee will discourage the many many retired Australians who would normally include Uluru in their travels. After all, what do you get for your $25? A visit to the visitors centre and use of a toilet? That's not very good value.
Does this also mean that the entry fee to Kakadu has gone up too?
It really doesn't make much sense when entry to Kings Canyon and Litchfield parks is free of charge.
marg is offline  
Old Apr 5th, 2004, 03:57 AM
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would not expect Kings Canyon to stay free much longer, there are now admission fees to Standley Chasm and the NPWS is deliberating on starting a permit system to travel off the bitumen here in the territory. The NPWS has already fenced off many areas and padlocked the gates to stop people from enjoying the natural wonders around here.

I know this is occuring in other parts of Australia but it just seems a self defeating policy, how can you promote tourism of the natural wonders and then turn around and lock them up so no one can see them? It is just sheer lunacy in my opinion.
Paul_S is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hlphillips2
United States
5
May 7th, 2014 07:08 AM
bwage30
Africa & the Middle East
5
Dec 24th, 2008 03:53 AM
jasher
Africa & the Middle East
6
Aug 12th, 2007 03:12 AM
Geckolips
Australia & the Pacific
16
Oct 27th, 2005 06:10 PM
Abby43
Australia & the Pacific
17
Jun 8th, 2004 06:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Your Privacy Choices -